Monday, 28 September 2015


North Korea says it can miniaturize nuclear weapons

2015-05-21


By Harry, South China Morning Post, Hong Kong 
from: http://www.asiaobserver.org/asian-political-cartoons 

This political cartoon shows the North Korean leader, Kim Jung-un and his officials "miniaturizing" their nuclear weapons. The cartoon uses symbolism and exaggeration. Symbolism is shown through the general behind Kim Jung-un who is measuring Kim Jung-un's hear to make it become exact and straight. This symbolizes that Kim Jung-un seemingly has everything done for him by those who are near him. Exaggeration would be from the facial expressions of the characters of the cartoon. The cartoonist portrayed Kim Jung-un as a very "mean looking" and stubborn while the other generals look similar to each other, tired, and sad. By the techniques he used, the cartoonist seems to have a very strong opinion about the event that he wants to show. The event seems to be about the issue of North Korea having weapons that could be deadly to the world but them trying to make it look like "it not a big deal" by deceptive ways. The cartoonist's view on this seems to be that North Korea is cheating and tricking everyone to believing something that isn't true. It also seems like the cartoonist is saying that Kim Jung-un can't do much by himself. I feel like the cartoon is strongly bias, although there are true aspects to it. I think I would have agreed with the article much more if it didn't have so much bias in it in that it shows only a one sided view of the issue. I think what they could have used is analogy where they compared the issue to another one so that the audience can understand where the cartoonist's view is originating from. 

Monday, 21 September 2015

Deadly Car Bombing at Somalia's Presidential Palace Is Claimed by Shabab
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
8:44 AM
MOGADISHU, Somalia- A car loaded with explosives was detonated Monday at the gate of the presidential palace in Mogadishu, killing at least four people and wounding a dozen others, witnesses and officials said.

The Shabab, a militant Islamist group affiliated with Al Qaeda, claimed responsibility for the attack, saying it targeted senior Somali and foreign officials.

Heavy smoke billowing from the explosion near the heart of the Somali government was visible across Mogadishu during evening prayers, as the sound of sirens and gunfire from troops trying to disperse crowds filled the air.

At least four people were hurt at the nearby SYL Hotel, according to witnesses. " My room's window fell to the ground in pieces," said one woman, Halima Ali. She said she had raced out of the room and had seen "huge smoke rising to the sky."

Information Minister Mohamed Abdi Hayir condemned the bombing, calling it a terrorist attack aimed at shattering the peace in Mogadishu. "The explosion happened at a security checkpoint at the presidential palace, across from the SYL Hotel, and damaged nearby houses and business centers," he said. He declined to comment on the number of casualties.

Two days of meetings had drawn Somali federal and state leaders and United Nations officials, among others, to the presidential palace for consultations on the 2016 presidential election process. The sessions at the palace, known as Villa Somalia, wrapped up shortly before the explosion.

The attack also coincided with Mogadishu's commemoration of the United Nations' annual International Day of Peace.

The Shabab came to prominence as a nationalist movement combating the United States-backed Ethiopian invasion of Somalia in 2006, seizing control of large parts of the country, including Mogadishu, the capital. The Shabab recently gained ground after African Union and Somali troops withdrew from several villages and towns in central and southern Somalia.

Ibrahim, Mohammed. "Deadly Car Bombing at Somalia's Presidential Palace Is Claimed by Shabab." 21 Sept. 2015. The New York Times. 22 Sept. 2015. <http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/22/world/africa/deadly-car-bombing-at-somalias-presidential-palace-is-claimed-by-shabab.html?_r=0>

Comment:

This article informs the reader about a specific event that happened in Somalia. The author seems to be very informational and not bias towards any one side. The author's goal seems to be just to inform the readers about a situation and the details of the event from a general point of view instead of a one-side based view. The tension between the Somalian government and the Shabab seems to be constant if not increasing. Although this article doesn't give an opinionated information, it does make me think about the possible terrorist attacks that many countries have faced and will face by the Shabab. 

Tuesday, 15 September 2015

As human flood continues, Germany slaps controls on border with Austria
By Anthony Faiola and Robert Samuels
BERLIN — Facing an unstaunchable flood of migrants and refugees, Germany on Sunday said it was reaching a breaking point and would implement emergency controls on its border with Austria, temporarily suspending train service and conducting highway checks along the main pipeline for thousands seeking sanctuary in Western Europe.
The move signaled the extent of the crisis confronting Europe, a region where a decades-long policy of open borders, once a source of pride and unity, is eroding as nations struggle to cope with a record flow of migrants. Only last week, Denmark temporarily closed a highway and suspended trains on its southern border with Germany, and French authorities have searched for migrants on trains crossing from Italy.
Yet even as Germany moved to restore “order” to the chaotic inflow, the death toll continued to jump. Off a Greek island on Sunday, 34 refugees, including four infants and 11 boys and girls, drowned when their wooden boat overturned and sank. It appeared to mark the worst loss of life in those waters since the migrant crisis began.
[The saga of the Syrian family whose 3-year-old drowned ]
Berlin says the emergency on its southeastern border is a question of national security. Germany has thus far stepped in to take in the most asylum seekers of any European Union nation, but its ability to aid refugees is being tested amid a record surge of 40,000 migrants over the weekend — from Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, among other countries. Officials in the overwhelmed state of Bavaria, for instance, declared they have run out of space to house refugees.
Coupled with an expected move by Hungary on Tuesday to reinforce its southern border with Serbia, the German action suggested that migrants may now face tougher barriers as they seek safety and hope.
“The aim of this measure is to restrict the current flow to Germany and to return to an orderly procedure of immigration,” German Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière said Sunday. He implied that many asylum seekers were trying to reach Germany because of its generous refugee benefits and seemed to fault other European nations for not stepping up to do more: “Asylum seekers have to accept that they cannot just choose the member state of the European Union granting them protection.”
[In migrant crisis, German generosity comes under fire]
In Germany, the new measures were already taking force. The German state-owned railway company Deutsche Bahn announced that train traffic from Austria to Germany would be suspended until 5 a.m. Monday. Bavarian officials said checks were starting on highways linking Austria to Germany, while the German Federal Police said that “all available units” were being rapidly dispatched to the border to help carry out checks.
At the main train station in Vienna, hundreds of desperate asylum seekers were camped out and waiting for word on whether and how they could move on. Austrian authorities were telling them to board buses to overnight shelters, but many refused for fear they would miss their chance to leave in the morning for Germany.
“We came all this way because we want to live in Germany, and were so happy when we reached Austria, because in Hungary we were treated so badly, and now we have the message that the trains have been stopped,” said Kamal, 50, an Iraqi from Basra traveling with five other men. He declined to give his last name to protect his family back home.
[Refugees came searching for a new life. Then someone got lost.]
Ivo Priebe, spokesman for the German Federal Police, said he was not aware of any bottlenecks due to the new controls. He said that not every car would be checked but that officers would conduct stop-and-search patrols on highways, roads and at railway crossings. Several hundred police officers had been sent into the border region by car and by helicopter earlier Sunday, he said.
“We know the paths they are using and will carry out increased controls there,” he said. He did not know how long the checks would be in place, he said, calling them the result of a “political decision.”
Indeed, the move highlighted the backlash brewing against the open-arms policy on asylum seekers taken by Chancellor Angela Merkel. Within her ruling coalition, many are still smarting over her recent decision to allow in tens of thousands of refugees stranded in Hungary. As Germany struggles to cope — turning army barracks, schools and former hardware stores into impromptu shelters — some politicians have called Merkel’s decision into serious question, arguing that the nation cannot provide sanctuary to all.
On Sunday, Bavarian Interior Minister Joachim Herrmann said at a news conference in Munich that cars would be monitored at the border in order to capture human traffickers and allow refugees to request asylum upon being stopped. But he said those who had already applied for asylum elsewhere in the E.U. — for instance, in Hungary or Austria — would be sent back to those countries in accordance with European laws.
“Unchecked immigration on the scale of the past days constitutes a serious threat for the public safety and order in Germany,” said Herrmann, a member of the Christian Social Union, sister party of Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU).
Depending on how long the stricter German border measures last, the decision could potentially spark new bottlenecks in Austria that could ripple into Hungary as well as other countries transited by those fleeing conflict and poverty.
[European railways become ground zero for the migrant crisis]
The German decision amounted to the latest blow against open borders in Europe, a policy dating back to the 1985 Schengen Agreement that today allows free movement across 26 nations. Assuming the new German checks are limited in duration, they would not violate the agreement, which allows nations to institute border restrictions under certain circumstances.
Germany, for instance, has set aside the agreement in the past for major international summits, and Belgium did so in 2000 during a major European soccer tournament, said Pieter Cleppe, head of the Brussels office of Open Europe, a regional think tank.
The open-borders treaty, he said, is not in immediate danger. But, he warned, “if temporary closures start becoming a de facto permanent set of border controls, we may be seeing the end of Schengen.”
The 28-nation E.U. is deeply divided over a plan backed by Germany and France to issue new migrant quotas to all nations. De Maizière on Sunday said Germany, which is expecting 800,000 asylum applications this year, could not shoulder the burden alone.
“The German readiness to help must not be overstretched,” he said. “The measure therefore is also a signal to Europe.”
E.U. interior ministers are meeting Monday in Brussels to discuss the disputed proposal for quotas and other regional efforts to contain the crisis.
Migrants and refugees continued to stream into Hungary over the weekend, as thousands of families from the Middle East and Africa tried to reach Europe before Hungarian authorities initiate a crackdown next week.
Meanwhile, governments continued to bicker about how to cope with the influx.
Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann, in an interview with German news magazine Der Spiegel, compared Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban’s treatment of refugees to the Nazis’ deportation of Jews.
“Sticking refugees in trains and sending them somewhere completely different to where they think they’re going reminds us of the darkest chapter of our continent’s history,” he said.
Hungary’s foreign minister retorted that such comments were “totally unworthy of any leading 21st-century European politician” and counterproductive to solving the crisis, according to the Associated Press.
Faiola, Anthony and Samuels, Robert. "As human flood continues, Germany slaps controls on border with Austria." 13 Sept. 2015. The Washington Post.15 Sept. 2015. <https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/migrants-coming-into-europe-reach-record-highs/2015/09/13/5c2732e9-dc33-4528-850d-94361c7b0917_story.html>


The above article shows the current situations of Germany and many other European countries who are experiencing mass numbers of immigrants. Although Germany has taken in mass numbers of people, it seems like they have reached a point where their own public safety and stabilization is at risk. The authors seem to acknowledge that Germany has offered help to the immigrants but also points out that the process has put their own country at risk. It also seems like the others empathize to the cause of Germany's help to the immigrants but not completely agree to the degree of Germany's help. Overall the article seems to encourage Germany's closing of the trains for a short period of time but it also empathizes to the immigrants who came all the way to Austria in order to live in Germany. The quotes that the authors use like "the German readiness to help must not be overstretched" show that the German help may have gone a little too far as to putting causing destabilization (Faiola, Robert).

Monday, 7 September 2015

Pakistan’s Burraq Drone Kills Three Militants, Officials Say
By Qasim Nauman
ISLAMABAD—An indigenously-developed drone killed three militants in Pakistan on Monday, marking the first use of the missile-firing aircraft in combat, the military said.
One of Pakistan’s Burraq drones, which carry two laser-guided Barq air-to-ground missiles, hit a suspected militant target, killing three people, in the North Waziristan tribal region near the border with Afghanistan, military officials said.
“1st ever use of Pak made Burraq Drone today. Hit a terrorist compound in Shawal Valley killing 3 high profile terrorists,” Major Gen. Asim Bajwa, the military spokesman, said in a message on his verified Twitter account.
The casualties in the Monday drone strike couldn't be independently verified as access to the area is restricted.
Before the drone strike on Monday, the U.S. and Israel were among the few countries to have ever used armed drones in combat, according to the New America Foundation, an independent Washington-based think tank.
Pakistan has been developing the drones for several years. The attack announced Monday, however, was the first time the country has admitted to using them in its battle with militant groups.
The Pakistani military has been engaged in an operation in North Waziristan for over a year trying to eliminate certain groups. The Shawal Valley is one of the last remaining pockets of militant presence in the area, military officials said.
The U.S. has been operating drones against militants in Pakistan’s tribal areas for more than a decade, with hundreds of strikes that have killed more than 2,000 people, according to The Bureau of Investigative Journalism.
While Islamabad’s official position is that the U.S. attacks are a violation of its sovereignty and counterproductive, some Pakistani officials have privately supported them in the past.
Military officials didn't immediately respond to queries about the Burraq’s range and cost or the number of them that are in service. The military successfully tested the Burraq for the first time in March this year, and said at the time it is an all-weather unmanned aerial vehicle, capable of hitting static and moving targets.
 Nauman, Qasim. "Pakistan’s Burraq Drone Kills Three Militants, Officials Say." 7 Sept. 2015. The Wall Street Journal. 7 Sept. 2015. <http://www.wsj.com/articles/pakistans-burraq-drone-kills-three-militants-officials-say-1441632088
The article seems to be strongly pointing at the "success" of the Pakistan's military of being able to make a drone that can fire at a specific target. The author's intention of this article seems to be to announce the advancement of Pakistan in this area with a tone that is covered in a sense of accomplishment. Although the drones can be an advantage in times of war, it can also be seen as a way that can easily lead to mass murder. This is because it stirs up the idea of merciless killing by something that does not have the human emotions which would take away the chance of people making their own choices according to their conscience. In the other hand, this article does bring out the hopes of less damage to the country that uses drones because it would require less humans for war, meaning less deaths to the country. This article strongly brings out the two sides of the different views because it stirs up the ethical issues of human killing drones. 
                Tiana Park.

Friday, 4 September 2015

My name is Tiana Park and I am  from South Korea. I have lived in Africa (Tanzania to be more specific…) for 10 years and  now am a Junior in Rift Valley Academy. RVA is a boarding school placed in Kenya, and is mostly attended by international students around the continent of Africa. I came to Tanzania when I was 7 years old and I call Tanzania home rather than South Korea. I am a typical third culture kid but I rather enjoy being one because it enables me to face and connect with the different views of the different cultures. I tend to have a passion for people and I enjoy being around people, helping people, and specially laughing with people.